Named means present
Seeing linalool on a label is proof it is in there, above the labelling threshold, and that someone was required to tell you.
Usually not with certainty — and that is a fact about how labels are written, not a failure of your reading. Here is exactly where the line falls.
If a list contains parfum, fragrance, aroma or perfume, you can stop reading. That single word stands in for a mixture the manufacturer does not have to itemise — possibly a few substances, possibly several hundred.
It is a positive finding, not a gap. The label is telling you something fragranced is present and that its contents are not published. A product declaring parfum has not passed anything — it has declined to answer.
Three different things are happening in this list at once.
Parfum the undisclosed mixture Named allergens pulled out of it by law
The named substances are not extras sitting alongside the perfume. They are the perfume — the parts of it that crossed a threshold and had to be shown.
This is the most important thing on the page, and it runs one way only.
Seeing linalool on a label is proof it is in there, above the labelling threshold, and that someone was required to tell you.
Below the threshold a substance is legally present and legally unnamed. A product can contain linalool and say nothing about linalool.
That asymmetry is the whole reason we can tell you confidently that something contains a fragrance material, and only rarely that it does not. It also means thresholds are not safety thresholds — they were set for labelling, from the concentration at which sensitised people typically react in patch testing. If you react below them, the label was never designed to help you.
In the EU, specific fragrance substances must be listed individually above a threshold.
The first compliance deadline passed on 31 July 2026, so newer products should name considerably more than older stock sitting beside them on the same shelf.
Read both against the ingredient list rather than instead of it.
Often means the product is not intended to smell of anything — sometimes achieved by adding a masking fragrance over the smell of the base. An unscented product can contain fragrance material.
The stronger claim — but in most markets it is not a regulated term and nobody checks it. Where a claim and a list disagree, we record the conflict rather than choosing which to believe.
"Natural" tells you nothing useful. Essential oils are fragrance materials: lavender oil is largely linalool. A botanical origin changes the supply chain, not what reaches your airway. Our rule is that fragrance function counts, never fragrance origin.
Four outcomes. Only one of them is a clean result, and it is the rarest.
A tracked substance appears on the label by name. The most informative result: you know what is there and can match it against what you react to.
The label declares parfum or an equivalent. Something fragranced is present and its contents are not published.
This is not a pass. It is the absence of an answer, recorded as a finding.
At least one ingredient is one we have not yet classified, so we cannot say nothing tracked is present. We name the ingredients that stopped us — so you can judge for yourself, and so we know what to research next.
This is an honest answer, not an error.
Every ingredient was recognised, none is tracked, and there is no undisclosed mixture. The narrowest honest clean result: it says this label discloses nothing we track, which is not the same as "safe for you".
It is rare, because a single unrecognised ingredient is enough to withhold it.
What to run your eye over, in order.
Where this gets you. You can usually establish that a product does contain fragrance. You can rarely establish that it does not. That is an unsatisfying answer, and it is the true one — a registry that rounded it up to "safe" would be worse than no registry at all.